I have idea, i have got dump of my demo kit nand, and i thinking about replacing. I dumped my jasper ( 512NAND ) and extracted secdata.bin kv.bin config.bin I have inject this file in to demo kit nand, and flash my jasper. Someone try this? I have got XDK 9328.0 and Flash 6717 on Jasper Retail.
I have NAND Backup from XDK 9328.0 and NAND Backup from Retail, i have put dev nand backup on retail xbox.
... Is it working or not? It sounds like you say its working but now it sounds like you haven't tried it yet. If your trying it, it will not work. If your telling me you got it to run then please verify. This makes no sense. Do you have a retail currently running a Dev nand right now or not?
not yet. I just asking about sugestions... and still searching KK for dev with exploit ( demo ) and recovery higher than 9328.0 ( flash 8498 8507 8955 )
Your going to run into a lot of problems, Converting a retail to dev isn't easy and to my knowlege hasn't been done before.
Retail has fuses set up like this: C0FFFFFFFFFFFFFF 0F0F0F0F0F0F0FF0 000000000000000 CPUKEY HERE CPUKEY HERE CPUKEY HERE CPUKEY HERE 000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000 And then DEV will have the second line different. That effectively prevents XeDK CB from booting on a retail board. :lol: Not to mention another truckloads of protections you would need to diasble. That's why nobody ever did it. Now with XBR out I doubt anyone would bother. :thumbsup:
XeDev has also released XeXMenu with FTP support and has an Xshell skin. XBR3 can do a lot more than a dev can do minus the debug features. For instance XBR3 can run either retail or dev signed xex's not even a dev itself can do that.
You saying "XBR3 can do a lot more than a dev can do minus the debug features." doesn't mean jack really.. Because the entire point of a dev is the debug features really.. Like being able to debug, use neighborhood to transfer files while you're playing, set memory + various other dev commands, etc etc.. Devs can still do a lot more.. Jtagged retails have unsigned xexs and content packages? Which we can already sign? Yay? Like I said, devs still have a lot more.. Let's not make stupid claims now.
The claim was correct as if your not doing anything with debugging then for the average joe its fine. In essence I was stating that there is no reason for him to try an attempt an XeDK and my aim was really to get him happy with what he has but w/e.
The only point here is that for the average Joe (you usual software pirate) a DEV is close to useless. A hacked retail is much more useful for such people. That kind of people don't care about debugging stuff, they only care if they can put a stolen game on their jig and have it play. :shrug:
Err, I personally wouldn't say that the JTAG Exploit is better then a Development Kit :\. Sure it can run dev and retail XEX's, but that's not something to die over, only takes a minute or two to convert for dev owners anyway. The JTAG is simpler and made for the mainstream general public. I'd say 95% of people that have their boxes JTAG'd are just there to run homebrew, emulators, games off their hdd, free arcade games, mw2 modded lobbies, etc. They don't have use for that in which a legitimate Development Kit provides, I'd say only the programmers and those who are interested in reverse engineering the 360, its games, or applications, have any use for one over a JTAG. In the end, yeah the Development Kit is a lot more resourceful and powerful, but the JTAG appeals to the average end user. -Doom edit:yah, oliveira beat me to it.
This isnt my specialty, Xbr emulates fuses to reboot into the newer kernel, so rebooting into a dev kernel while emulating dev fuses, well it either works or it doesn't, but my question is whats preventing us from emulating the correct fuses? and if your post just answered that, i don't understand. im not arguing, i just want to know out of curiosity.
Partnernet is fine atm, technically you can get on PN without even a dev flash so if it was in danger we would already be screwed. I wouldn't worry about it though I doubt anyone capable is going to make a exploit to run dev flashes only because they are smart enough to know the outcome.
Let's pray you're right on that one. Microsoft would be smart enough to know if something did happen though. I assume that the consequences of the exploiter is the 'outcome' you're referring to.
