http://forums.lostlevels.org/viewtopic.php?t=1651 And a youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Xxfikm1tYE
Unorthodox: Thank you mate . However it was already commented here: http://www.assemblergames.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17259 .
Dude, my video capture card is laggy as hell. I have to guess where everything will end up much ahead of time!! *looks on google for a pinocchio animated gif*
Mark: Ha ha ha . Nah, I'm not blaming you. In fact I'm a real clumsy player so I better shut up my mouth just now, he he .
http://kotaku.com/368887/dreamcast-rez-beta-k+project-released Great, now many others will see how bad I suck.
I put a high resolution video of this up on my site a few weeks back if anyone want's to see it in better quality than the crap YouTube offers. yakumo
Mark: Bah, don't worry. People tend to critize too much. It's Internet after all. One day they lick your ass and the next one they call you idiot. At least you've a collection that many of them only could dream. Unorthodox: It's ok . Yakumo: YouTube will make available higher resolutions soon if I'm not mistaken. Anyway, it will take time...
Yeah but they will still be lower than what's possible. Probably at 400kbps with mono audio. I use 800kbps (most of the time) with stereo audio. Still, I guess it would be very costly for YouTube to offer very good quality with the amount of videos uploaded every day. Yakumo
Yakumo: I just explained that new feature from YouTube . Indeed, it was already possible passing a quality parameter via GET, in the URL of the video. Obviously, anyone with not such a huge bandwidth spent can use higher bitrates, I agree.