Oh yes he di.........aww fuck just click here... DISCLAIMER: back in the 50s when everything was great(not) what you know as ecstasy was the "new" drug that cured everything, like zoloft or something, and it was sold to everyone and pushed in the mainstream media because nobody had seen requiem for a dream and/or knew it could kill you..........like zoloft does. PS: I'm j/k at the end BTW...
Loled at the plottwist in the end. So unexpected OMG! As we speak Mickey is a Peepo Head and with Goofy's help his Peppos rule africa.
? Ecstasy is MDMA (Methylenedioxymethamphetamine), which wasn't synthesised until the late 1970s. That's Speed/Base (Methamphetamine) that Mickey's been boshing. Important lessons we learn fron this comic: - Amphetamines are awesome - Space Cakes send you to sleep - Find natives sell them quality drugs ?? profit :033:
You are probably confusing it with 2CB which wasn't synthesized until the 70s. MDMA was first synthesized in, if memory serves, 1936 by a German company (their best contribution to society, by far). --Looks up-- I was wrong, it was 1912: http://www.a1b2c3.com/drugs/x_01.htm However, it was never pushed into the "mainstream" by anyone although it had clinical use, until the 80's, where it invaded the upcoming rave culture and was popularized in one of the most unlikeliest of places: Dallas, Texas. It was somewhat quickly classified as Class A in, I believe, 1985. Maybe if it had been more of a household name it could've survived the beurocratic battle and remainded at least available on a prescribed level. Requiem for a Dream, while not about drugs specifically, did not heavily emphasize MDMA use. Their choice of poison, was of course heroin. If it had been MDMA, it would've been a far less tragic story, and probably way more enjoyable for the participants. To this day, it still receieves a rating of "totally fucking awesome". I've never met anyone that didn't have a blast trying it out. But, of course, to each their own.
I know, I was making a joke, thats the whole zoloft and "PS: I'm j/k at the end BTW..." at the actual end... Dont you remember the old lady's pills? what do you think those were?
I know exactly what they were: "Diet pills" which is an extremely broad categorization, but they are not MDMA if we're to believe the story wanted to convey any type of accuracy or realism... in relation to either addiction itself or the pills' attainability from a doctor by simply showing up and saying you have a fat ass. Her symptoms were text-book long-term speed. Not euphoric. Don't let the "A" in the abbreviation throw you... short & long term effects between the two are night and day.
Amen. And yeah, the old lady's pills in Requiem would've been amphetamine-based, dexedrine (dextroamphetamine) or similar. Purple hearts and all that. Speed is a dirty drug, kids, stay away.
Any time you make a mistake it's someone else who isn't getting "the joke" or your "sarcasm" or whatever. You need to learn to admit you get things wrong sometimes. We all do.
This is like hearing retards saying fire doesnt burns, seriously how can you confuse an obvious satire like that for serious commentary? how can you take it as fact when I say the problem was that nobody had seen RFAD in the FUCKING 50s??! the movie is from the YEAR 2000, GET IT? DO YOU GET IT NOW?:banghead:
Getting angrier doesn't make you more convincing. Quite the opposite, in fact. If I were a doctor I'd prescribe you some sedatives, maybe an antipsychotic, but alas.
