that is not a pitbull, that is just a normal bullterrier (well that is we call them in Denmark) and poor dog.
If the dog is too stupid to realize that needles hurt then I don't feel sorry for it. Most dogs would have backed off and just barked at it after getting stuck a few times.
Doesn't look like a pit, but that's what the headline (and name of the jpg if you check) said. Man, that just looks fucking painful.
Dogs are dumb animals anyway. It's it's own sorry arse fault for not backing off. I actually think it's quite funny. You wouldn't see a cat like that. Yakumo *now runs off to hide from all the dog lovers*
Dear god.... I don't like dogs at all (I have six cats right now - My usual two had their last litter), but I just feel sorry for the poor little fellow... I hope for his sake he was taken to a vet and it was curable and he's now alright. Please.
Most owners of Pitt Bulls or whatever are as stupid as the dogs anyway 99% of them are to make the owner look hard!
So true virtual alan. The amount of nobheads I saw in Liverpool last year with Pitt Bulls was amazing ! Almost every other scum had one. Yakumo
in the u.s. american pit bull terriers have traditionally been a family dog, and they are a very good dog if you have children. someone gets mauled by a dog, the media reports it, then focus's on that one breed...soon their is a blitz of media reports on dog attacks by this single breed. it doesnt mean that the breed is anymore prone to viciously attack someone than another breed, it just means the media is cherry picking incidents that only involve a specific breed for ratings. and because the media does this, there is that crowd who will pick a breed because the media says its a vicious dog...wether it is or isnt. before the pit bull media frenzy there was the doberman pinchers, rottweilers, and german shepards...basically any working dog that hasnt been cast as a vicious killer in the past will be in the future. a golden retriever statistaclly is more likey to maul someone to death than a pittbull, yet you dont hear about that on the news...thats because golden retrievers arnt on the medias radar. if you take any dog and abuse it, its going to have problems that could very likely lead it to bite, maul, or kill someone. as for that picture, i feel bad for the dog, but worse for the porcupine.
In numbers alone sure more Golden Retrievers attack due to there being more GR's in America but percentage/proportionally Pit Bulls attack more often than any other breed in North America. I love dogs and that includes Pit Bulls but I think how they're raised makes the dog vicious more often than the genetics. In any even I don't think he'll be trying to tear up his masters Sonic doll anytime soon.:smt043
actually you would be incorrect on that, im pretty sure the alaskan malamute holds the highest percentage for number of maulings-deaths per number of dogs. its all bullshit. people need something to blame, blaming irresponsible owners isnt a great option for a politican.
Hmmmm here in my town i know an american pitbull that goes by the name Loco (yes sir loco) but it is not crazy at all, and i know the owner, that dog is being treated well and is one of the sweetest dogs i know, although when it gets happy it likes to bounce into one´s stomache (well i don´t think it knows it hits the stomache) but that dog is very pretty and beautiful and is the sweetest dog , if i don´t count my former friends two lovely labrador retrievers in, then it comes in as a third one. but those two dogs are as follows Coco the bitch (no not an offence but a bitch is a female dog) is smart (no shit it knows how to get and find food. And that dog is also a sweet loving i care about. And then the male dog Nico, the most stupid,unintelligent, but the most wonderfull male dog i know and those three dogs makes my heart pound, just for them , and i want to hug them all
...I love the way both the owner and the dog are happily posing to take photo's as if they didn't have a care in the world
