Hey Everyone, So I was reading about a proposed solution to Zodiac's 32-Symbol cipher here: http://unazod.com/Wilks_32.htm Any thoughts? Does this look like an acceptable solution, or does anyone call BS?
I thought this solution was notable because it's seems difficult to reproduce without being intentional, and it doesn't have a load of crackpot assumptions like other people seem to have. But I wonder if anyone has seriously looked at this to see if the Uni-bomber is really Zodiac or not.
@ASSEMbler: That is another possibility. The reason why some people don't believe this fact is because in many of the documents he wrote, he made gestures which are consistent with someone being careful. That is, when he wrote some of the cryptograms out, he made mistakes and was quick to scratch errors out and fix it. If you were really just fooling around, you probably wouldn't go though that kind of trouble. I'm sure there are other reasons which also support this theory, but I'm no expert.
