ok, ok, maybe it's only because i'm really tired right now or something, but am i the only one that say things like this? let me explain: they named the xbox 360 ''360'' because 2 was lower than 3, but at the same time, isn't 360 degre a revolution in a spacial way? Sorry now, i'm going to bed. :smt1062 and the ''ring'' in the tittle was a concept too, btw. :-D ...ok, ok i'm in my bed!
I'd buy that. Though it might be because I too am tired, and also slightly drunk. Turning 360 degrees is a complete revolution, i.e. as good as nintendo. And 360 beats 3 by either 60 or 357 depending on how you look at it, i.e. better than Sony.
wooo we al drunk tonight? been down the student union..... i was thinking that too, as such could it singnal a joint union between nintendo and microsoft (i doubt it, and im half drunk)?
Wednesday night seems like it's a given in British campuses then, I've had a few. I would have gone to my union if only the place was worth visiting... give me the postgrad bar instead any day... Back on topic, it does seem a kind of a coincidence that the Xbox now has a 3 in it's name as well as the next Playstation. I doubt Nintendo have anything to do with Microsoft though, that just doesn't seem at all plausible...
