bitcoins...

Discussion in 'Off Topic Discussion' started by karsten, Feb 17, 2012.

  1. Calpis

    Calpis Champion of the Forum

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,906
    Likes Received:
    21
    FPGA are a way to get your concept up and running (at a lower performance) when you're still working it out, but there's no reason it can't be skipped entirely if you've already got a working design or even just your specifications completed. Simulation using the vendor's cells/macros/constraints is a necessity anyway--you can't afford to mess up.
     
  2. TriMesh

    TriMesh Site Supporter 2013-2017

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    750
    The ASIC bitcoin miners I've seen are built using gate arrays - which makes a lot of sense, since SHA can be efficiently implemented on gate arrays, and that sort of semi-custom process flow has both shorter lead times and much lower cost than going full-custom.

    This doesn't work using Scrypt, though - you either end up having to implement block RAM using gates (which burns up resources very quickly) or go to a full custom approach so that you can drop lots of RAM blocks onto the die - and the second approach will easily end up costing you millions of dollars by the time you end up with production ready silicon. This is very problematic in a market which has such a large first-mover advantage.
     
sonicdude10
Draft saved Draft deleted
Insert every image as a...
  1.  0%

Share This Page