Next gen console game prices .. the $20 bump

Discussion in 'General Gaming' started by ASSEMbler, Oct 7, 2005.

  1. Sinjd

    Sinjd Spirited Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    0
    I see that happening too, but I somehow doubt that the consumer will gain any cost benefit from that, they will charge the same price and just keep the extra cash for themselves.
     


  2. ...Think 'yourself' lucky, 360 games will cost us double in the U.K, what they cost you peeps in the U.S.


    :smt045
     
  3. Johnny Vodka

    Johnny Vodka Fiery Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    0
    i had to do chores and stuff to scrounge up $65-$70 for a goddamn N64 game back in the day, but now I have a steady job...so it's not that bad. I guess it's just what you're willing to pay. I'm sure I'll do more reading about a game if I'm gonna pay that much for it though. I'm tired of buying games and they end up blowing ass and can be beat in like a day...like Doom III.

    But yeah, I don't see how this is gonna encourage parents to buy their kids this stuff for christmas or whatever.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2005
  4. ASSEMbler

    ASSEMbler Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    19,394
    Likes Received:
    995
    Seriously, I would only pay $70 for a halo epic style game, not for some next gen crap like saints row.

    360 is already modded, the mod chips are in near beta by now. I expect 360 piracy within a month.

    ps3 will have a lot more protection, but it has the magic stick, and probably the piracy will originate there.

    Revolution will use larger dvds, but probably the backwards spinning tech from gamecube. Probably just as hard to crack as gamcube was too.

    Personally, I think 360 and ps3 will do o.k., but I think revolution with the low cost under 15 market will not be the #1 seller, or even #2, but they will be the most profitable.

    Remember, sony is saddled with debt from the failing consumer division, and microsft has lost FOUR BILLION DOLLARS on xbox, and soon to be 8 billion including 360. Look for an exit from the industry after 360 for sure.
     
  5. Sinjd

    Sinjd Spirited Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    0
    ^microsoft leaving the market, and Nintendo deciding (in its own words) not to compete with Sony (and currently MS) spells trouble... As sony will just dominate and abuse its possition, which isn't good... Sony is already turning into an arrogant beast
     
  6. Putzi

    Putzi Rising Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    The 360 costs too much and so do the games it'd be cheaper to build a gaming pc and download all the games you want and get all your old emus at the sametime. I think the prices are too high and they need to cut them down alot Its expensive gaming now at these prices you'll be in debt becuase you wanted to play halo.
     
  7. Johnny Vodka

    Johnny Vodka Fiery Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    0
    hey hey hey...what about the phantom? Sony will not be unopposed...

    :D
     
  8. madhatter256

    madhatter256 Illustrious Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    6,578
    Likes Received:
    4
    DOn't you guys remember that before the PSX, games used to cost $60+ because they were cartridges. These new games will cost that much because cost of making the disc is rising a bit and because it takes more money to develop a game now, regardless if its a game from a AAA company or a small developer.
     
  9. cahaz

    cahaz Guardian of the Forum

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    4,586
    Likes Received:
    2
    i bet we'll see a second crash, or something (maybe not as dramatic, but we'll definitivly see something), since sony have reached a technology standard that is more than adequate to pull large and beautiful worlds. what will they do next? Make a bigger console? Nintendo will start something else, apart from sony's plan, so the competition will be...low. Low competition means, i-don't-care-if-it's-shit-'cause-it's-the-only-thing-on-the-market-anyway attitude. pray that Nintnedo save the industry again, and that sega come back to life and make the war to nintendo like in the old days. :-D
     
  10. Mr. Casual

    Mr. Casual Champion of the Forum

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2004
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    4
    If M$ goes out, it'll just be like that era of PSX vs. Nintendo, again. Sony is one of the leaders in making casual titles, but they have some awesome RPGS, too. With Microsoft gone, its one less contender for Nintendo to deal with, so they may thrive, again. Why would Nintendo say they dont want to compete with Sony? Have they given up? I hope not. We need at LEAST 3 systems on the market.

    BTW, "tac on all that hidden pay per play crap"

    Whats this pay per play shit?!
     
  11. ASSEMbler

    ASSEMbler Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    19,394
    Likes Received:
    995
    There was already a survey showing some noticable drop in interest in video games by younger teens. I would tie this in directly with the new generation having a more focused interest in social interaction and sex than older ones. That generation is called "generation me".

    You have to see that mario , zelda and other characters are not cherished by younger generations as by older.

    They grew up with titles like twisted metal, pokemon and sims. I personally see the revered series of today becoming niche "legacy" titles.

    Personally I don't think zelda has more than 3-4 more console games to it. Just look at metroid, it didn't translate the same to 3d, and it's far from memorable like it was on 2d. I can't see more than 3-4 console titles for that series either.

    The only series that last forever are rpg games, and the emphasis is on story.

    Just look at pitfall.. It had it's run, and now it's over. Same will happen to zelda someday.
     
  12. Mr. Casual

    Mr. Casual Champion of the Forum

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2004
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    4
    I wonder how many more Final Fantasies are going to be made...
     

  13. ...So true, Megadrive carts / MEGA CD games / Saturn games / P.C games, used to cost me £30-40 at release, making current and future gen titles cheaper in real terms, allowing for inflation.

    ...It doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out the maths! :D
     
  14. sayin999

    sayin999 Officer at Arms

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,407
    Likes Received:
    113
    its funny too cause i remember it was not shocking to pay $80 for a new super nintendo game, the thing is, how did people afford it back then, its not like now where $50 is just standard and you got your $20 and $40 titles, i mean how were they able to sell games so well at those prices. Not only that, but when 64 first came in japan, for awhile i belvie they were paying $100 a game easily, can you imagine how much that was to import yeesh, hey it could be worse, it could be alot more if we were still using cartridges. Still i wonder, how the hell did people easily afford games at those prices back then?
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2005

  15. ...So true, it's all relative, it's like when the first Video Recorders came out in the 70's, they cost like £2,000 to buy, you were lucky to earn much more than that per year, I don't think new technology ever did come "easily", you saved and if it's what you wanted you bought it.

    ...Nowadays it's peanuts compared to the price's of old, it's only now that things are 'easy' in real terms.

    ...One of the best comparisons I always use is the price of RAM, just remember how much that used to cost per stick, then think yourself lucky nowadays!
     
sonicdude10
Draft saved Draft deleted
Insert every image as a...
  1.  0%

Share This Page