According to the website FGN Online, the architecture of IBM POWER7 is used in the PlayStation 4. The PlayStation 4 would be 200 GFlops, ten times as fast as the PlayStation 3. source: http://fgnonline.webs.com/ In 2012/13 the PS3 would be 6 years on the market, about same amount of time the PS2 replaced the PS1. What do you think, could there be any truth in this story?
It makes sense, at least a continued IBM partnership. And 2012 wouldnt be too terribly either, 2 good years left, while the beginning of 2012 becomes a mess of 'Delayed for Next-Gen'.
Next playstation is going to suck balls if psp go is any sign of their business method. It probably won't even have physical media.
Didn't sony want to have a 10 year life cycle with the ps3. Seems a bit early to me. And it will still be blu ray in it <img>
The specs sound good, but as said: If there's no physical media involved, Sony's gonna suck ass. At least I won't buy it then, mind you. BTW: Am I the only one who feels that this is too early in relation to the amount of "good games" that have been released for the PS3 up to now? When the PS3 came out, I felt like the PS2 had got everything possible in its lifespan, God of War 1+2 being the last real benchmark titles. The PS3 though still has a lot of potential power to show and so far there were only very few massive blockbuster titles, rather opposite to the PS2 in 2004 when it was one hell of a software monster.
So some tiny unknown website comes along with absolutely no proof to back up their claims and expects us to believe that they have a definitive release date for the PS4 Why are we having this conversation?
2 years for ironing out, testing, libraries, coding and most importantly, games is a tad short for a prepared launch I believe, don't you?
Well, no, because the leak is not the instant Sony started the development of the system. It probably has been in the works for at least a year already. I don't think the GPU will be Power VR, though the PSP2 is supposed to have a VR5 variant.
10 year life cycle means it can still run alongside whatever the new hardware console is. PS2 still seeing games almost 10 years later while the PS3 is currently out.
I don't believe it's nowhere near. One thing is R&D. Another is a finished product, dev kits, as so on. Plus the PS3 is finally gaining more market. I don't see it being launched before 2015.
A late 2012 release doesn't seem out of the question. I haven't heard anything about compatibility with the PS3 but I hope it's true.