Doubters beware... Always double check if the screenshots you post are in fact real or not according to the website you got them from.
I have to say, Call of Duty 2 was freaking awesome, as was Kameo (though im not fond of the place where they start you). King Kong was ok, if not for it being so dark and a slightly unstable framerate. Best part was it was on an actual Kiosk, not a walmart one.
I played Kameo at the Tokyo Game Show and thought it was crap. Didn't look all that special to me. Same goes for that mech game that Sega are publishing. Final Fantasy also looks pretty standard. Now Ridge Racer 6, Dead Or Alive 4 and Nintynine Knights did look very nice indeed !! Yakumo
Is it common practice for you to put down games without even playing them? Even a decent computer can run the game looking fantastic with a good frame rate. Out of all the pics on IGN I love how you went with the one that clearly had all the options set to minimum. http://media.pc.ign.com/media/016/016856/imgs_1.html
And you know I haven't played Quake 4 how? Please show me a screenshot from Quake 4 that looks fantastic/
Nice try cahaz, but it's well known now that the killzone footage was generated on the ps3....at like 1fps, and then sped up for the video presentation with added in sound. So I say that doesn't quiote count as 'real'.
This post was a sarcasm directed to the thread, which contain suposedly real screenshot posted from members that can't be 100% sure if it is true or not. Of course, we all know these Killzone 2 images aren't taken from any games coming on the ps3. I tried to find "gameplay screenshots" of the Nintendo ON too, but without any success.
Real Time on the cell, that's for sure. Real, i wouldn't doubt it, but i'm not 100% sure. Here's something real, for sure:
i saw a video of mgs4 and they were messing around with it "changing colors,facial expretions, moving around the cam, etc" it had a debug menu, so... i guess it was real?