The World We Live In...

Not for the faint of heart.

Police: Texas woman accused of killing newborn son ate part of his brain, chewed off toes

Link

:-(

 

I urge people not to read that story. It's awful, truly awful

 

WHAT

THE

FUCK

these people deserve to be tortured and kept alive for suffering purposes. Society must be cleansed of such rubbish.

I am all for mandatory castration of mentally sick individuals. They degenerate the human race.

 

agreed, total scum.

 

:-( :crying:

 

What the fuck... I was thinking that I was going to puke while reading it... Seriously, people like that woman don't deserve living.

 

Some took "A Modest Proposal" a little too far...

 

some people shouldnt be alowed to live.

 

.................!


How mentally sick do you have to be to even thinking about something like that? People will never stop surprizing me

 

What about disabled people? People with inherited diseases? What about sub 100 IQ people? Hell, what about Jews? What a stupid thing to say.

Anyway, what a horrid story, words really do escape me.

 

A stupid thing indeed to say, too bad you're the one who's saying it.

I think everyone on this forum can deduct that by using the phrase "mentally sick people" within this particular topic I am clearly refering to sick, i.e ill willed, or dangerous if you may, individuals. People who's intention is ill, or sick, not that they are ill/sick physically.

Just to put things into perspective, there are laws that make it illegal to have sex with even mentally challenged people in order to minimize the risk of further offspring.
It's on a similar basis with why you have blood tests before getting married - so your children are not at risk of hereditary or other disorders. The whole point is to protect children and society.

To suggest that Jews (info: not all Hebrews suffer of inherit diseases due to limited genetic variation) or slightly handicapped people who are otherwise fine in their day to day activities is what I was implying is a) wilfully blind to the point I m trying to make b) borders on lible if anyone takes the comment you made the wrong way. Do I seem like a hate-monger? If anything, as a lawyer I m always trying to be objective.

What I will not accept however is that people who are dangerous by whatever reason to have the freedom to reproduce, primarily because they can pose a danger to the physical and/or mental status of their children. Case in point, the subject matter of this thread.

I will take that your comment was naive, else I'd have to assume you're just acting in bad will against me by distorting the interpretation of what is easily in line with laws and views expressed by the majority. You have indirectly suggested that I have racial or social preferences, which is clearly not the case.

Anyway, no hard feelings ;-)

 

...........

Man, just wow... :-(

 

The asylums are called churches, however they let the inmates run free and that's what causes problems. Remember "Satan" told her to do this.

Remember, she's not "sick", she just needs the power of "Jesus"

 

I think I did misunderstand what you were saying. I was assuming somewhat by the tone (the words castration and degeneration in particular) of what you said you were tarring, intentionally or not, disabled people in general with the same brush. I'm still not sure I entirely understand what your definition is, as to me mental and physical sickness generally go hand in hand (as in mental disorders have their roots in a difference in the physical make up of a person). Therefore an 'ill intention' is not always an act of 'free will'. Its difficult to define what a normal person is though, I'm not really sure where I can go with this!

Personally I think such laws are somewhat wrong, I'd rather everyone be allowed a choice. I'm well aware that problems would result from not having such laws in place and neither way is a perfect solution, its my moral viewpoint that takes issue with society deciding on people's behalves. I don't believe people should be imposed responsibility for the whole human race just by being in the same species. Choice I believe would allow for more incentive towards responsibility than mandatory rules. In certain situations of course, I don't think it can work when millions of people are involved.

btw I wouldn't assume people interpret what you say is the same as your viewpoint is and vice versa. People assume what appears most obvious to them. As this has shown! My comment wasn't a personal thing also, as I'm not really an active member of this board i don't know you, so hope you didn't take it that way!

 

It's alright mate, no worries!

Laws that make sexual acts with mentally challenged individuals illegal are in place in order to protect these individuals and/or any possible offspring. There have been countless accounts of "care takers" abusing their position since the old times with regard to these individuals.

Although I understand your argument concerning the subjectivity of what is normal, harm can be objectively defined and a person's liberty is limited as you know in our society the moment they start causing harm to others, especially minors - even if they don't know if what they are doing is wrong or right. It's the result that matters in this case - you wouldn't want to be eaten just to support liberty of thought

 

I wonder how it tasted...

 

Man, that's gross!

 

Yay fascism!

 

some humans are just better than others, deal with it :lol: