Intel Graphics Media Accelerator?

my card seems mostly unaffected by AA. I can place it to none or to x8 and the frames remain the same. I think there's some XBOX architecture to thank for that, specifically the ArtX/Ati team

 

Also depends on the game, some games AA just doesnt work for some reason, ingame or not.

 

True, but to say they cannot make GFX chips is an exageration. They jsut don't aim for the high end (yet).

 

I have a Core Duo 1.8ghz with Intel GMA 945GSE or whatever and it runs the Saturn emulator perfectly; N64, too.

Edit:

And I can run dual screens from it. The software is adequate- I dual screen with 1280x800 (laptop) and 1440x900 (tv), and use it also with a sole 1280x1024 screen...

 

that would be PS6.

 

The Irony

That's I could come up with looking for a photo of a PS 4

anywho My Currant XP machine Runs Project 64 no problem but I have come across quite a few bad dumps of games.

 

That is an old photoshop, GoH.

And even though it didn't have wireless motion detecting, the PS2 DVD remote could be used as a controller for a few games.

 

it could be used for all games actually.

I ve even played final fantasy VII (original disk running in a PS2) for a bit using the remote. The reason is simply because it acts just like a controller that lacks two analog sticks.

Same applies for the official BD remote for the PS3, as long as you assign it to number 1, 2 or whatever number you need to assign it to for the game to be played, instead of its default, which is 7.

 

Well, technically it could be used for all games, but good luck actually playing the crapload of PS2 games that need analog sticks with it :110:

 

well I often use the BD remote to navigate in GT prologue in order to watch my replays