Well, everyone listed on their Kickstarter (but not their terrible website) has exactly zero experience with consoles. So far the only game they have is a shitty FPS. And of course not everyone is going to use it for pirated games, but there's a sizable chunk of users who are just going to use it for their emulators and pirated movies. (and of course there's the people who want to play indie games, because they just can't get enough of the steady stream of shitty zombie and fake 8-bit games on PC)
whell there's already a few famous indies and Final Fantasy III too, and i expect quite a few from namco/bandai when the sign the agreement
http://namcobandaigames.com/android Can't wait to play those fantastic titles: both Sky Gamblers and Mad Tracks! Oh, and by the way: http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkai...le-are-we-headed-toward-a-crowdfunding-crash/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/08/01/this-is-ouyas-fatal-flaw/
I'd sooner put $30 towards a 360 controller and $70 towards a HTPC that will actually have a shot at upcoming emulators, not just ports of 10 year old code. http://www.fanlesstech.com/
Actually looking at the video for sky gamblers it looks like it could be a lot of fun. (at least being played with a controller they look like they could be fun). The articles are fun too they show lot's of things that COULD go wrong or arent' explained yet. With just about much backing as your statements. In what world? What kind of Mobo, ram, cpu, case, and gpu (even integrated) can you build that actually would have a shot at "upcoming" emulators. I can see you possibly doing it for $200 and easily for $300, but no way in hell for $70. I can see the Ouya being good to emulate everything up till N64 maybe Dreamcast, but I can't see a $70 pc doing better than that either.
Mobile games are really not as much fun when you actually sit down to play them on a full fledged system, though. A good example of this is the PC version of the new Death Rally. Yeah, Forbes magazine, what do they know? I'd rather unquestioningly trust some company that has a shitty website with shitty renders. He said he'd put that money towards an HTPC, not that he'd get one for $100.
Yeah Forbes is speculating and they are a lot better at it then you are. They raise concerns but then again they are also willing to admit that it could work "The Ouya may indeed turn out to be a disruptive force in the gaming industry. Then again, it may never get made. If it doesn’t, you’ll not only never own an Ouya, you’ll never see whatever money you put into the project again. With that at stake, these turn out to be pretty big “ifs.”" They also mention this Update: Ouya responds, noting that “our tech is all standard, we’re just combining it in an interesting way and putting it in a beautiful Yves Behar designed package. It’s totally doable.” For a more in-depth response, they point us to this Engadget interview. See the thing is about Forbes is they are a great magazine but they are waiting details just like the rest of us. The thing that makes me laugh is it's like you aren't even reading my posts. I feel like I'm talking to wall. Oh and as far as the HTPC thing goes my mistake. I misread that. $100 could definitely be a good start to an HTPC and $300 should definitely build a 1080p capable media system with good emulator capability.
Yeah, but that fact that they are also speculating that the Ouya is a piece of shit kinda validates my points. Man, that is one stupid interview full of marketing doublespeak like "core game developers" and "AAA content" and their examples of support are stuff like "Brian Fargo said on Twitter that the Ouya could be pretty cool".
That depends on your definition of "good". Today's accurate emulators for 8 and 16-bit consoles are barely within reach of its 1.6 GHz Cortex-A9. Tomorrow's emulators spawned from the emerging low-level movement will be completely out of reach. And this is with native apps, VM apps can expect an order of magnitude hit.
The bullshit ouyatards are pushing to somehow validate their waste of $99 is what is called genetic fallacy: so what? because not all critics of the ouya are millionaires with millionaires friends and connections to help them launch a stupid project (the kickstarter was a publicity stunt for presales) then they are not allowed to point out all the obvious mistakes they are making? mistakes that many other companies made when thinking videogames were a joke and anyone could make money in this market. These guys dont even have ONE measly exclusive, it's all rehashes or ports The bottom line is that if the ouya was a console made by any well-known company EVERYBODY would call it a joke and doomed to fail
Right great arguments again let me borrow your crystal ball some time. Human Element is an exclusive so more bad information but obviously I'm used to it by now. since that was an awesome response you just wrote up.
"Human Element explores the true threat in the zombie apocalypse" Just what everyone was asking for, another fucking zombie game. Also, a prequel to a game that's not scheduled for release until 2015 :dejection:
"Accurate" from what point of view - developer or user ? For example BSNES lacks zip support and doesn't run a few games that Snes9x does. All accurate NES emulators run at full speed on N570 netbook. Kega Fusion runs everything at full speed too. Cycle-accurate ? There's none atm. And i see no reason to make cycle-accurate emulators for portable devices and consoles. If it runs 99% of games without glitches, playable to the end - it's accurate enough to play games. And developers usually use desktops.
<nerd rant> System-wide accuracy. Emulators are emerging that go past "cycle-accuracy"/pseudo-accurate timekeeping and actually implement components as state machines only slightly abstracted from their silicon. The goal isn't just to offer superior component synchronization and edge case handling, it's to produce an elegant and efficient (albeit slower) model. Then there's display emulation. Beyond pixel accuracy there have been efforts to simulate CRT characteristics such as the correct pixel aspects, barrel distortion, raster bloom and the shadow mask/aperture grille. On top of that there are NTSC and PAL "filters" which generate and decode the composite signal in software. These are things lots of nostalgic people want and have already caught on. Then there's sound. We're seeing more emulators implement high-order FIR filters for alias-free resampling. Just this feature will load a CPU as much as ZSNES. Sure not everyone wants these features and they're not necessary to play games (debatable) but its the direction emulation is taking and if people want to use the latest builds that add other attractive features, they'll probably need the speed. Current-gen consoles as well as mid-high end desktops can handle the load of these features today, so personally I'll stick to the better, already available, hardware. Yes there's the argument of cost, but eh AMD Trinity systems will be cheap. People buying the Ouya should do so for today's Android games and streaming stuff, it won't make a particularly attractive emulation platform. There will be plenty of other SoC platforms out soon enough... By 2014 it seems ARM SoC will be able to LLE PS2.
I took a gamble and pledged $99 Being British, we always love the underdog ) You never know what might happen
7Force and Shadowlayer no EXACTLY what is going to happen. Your money is gone! Welcome to the club :encouragement:
Extremely Ultimate Doom 2: Hell Hath Mucho Fury Edition < are they serious that is one of the longest game names outside of street fighter i have ever seen lol
